In a noteworthy development at SOL day 2, Dr. Jairus Grove, a political science professor at the University of Hawaii, shared intriguing insights on the nuances of UFO disclosure. Preceding Karl Nell’s presentation, Dr. Grove emphasized a crucial distinction in the definitions of controlled versus catastrophic UFO disclosure, highlighting the disparities at both national and international levels.
“The definitions of controlled versus catastrophic UFO disclosure are different at the national versus international levels… and both are a zero sum game,” Dr. Grove asserted, setting the stage for a thought-provoking discussion on the potential outcomes of disclosing information about unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP).
What adds an intriguing layer to this discourse is the alignment of Dr. Grove’s key points on what controlled and catastrophic UAP disclosure would theoretically entail. These align seamlessly with Karl Nell’s controlled disclosure timeline, suggesting a convergence of perspectives among experts in the field.
As the UFO community awaits further revelations, the divergence in perspectives regarding controlled and catastrophic disclosure adds complexity to the ongoing conversation, leaving room for speculation and anticipation regarding the future of UFO revelations.
Dr. Jairus Grove (a political science professor at the University of Hawaii) spoke at SOL day 2 just before Karl Nell. Dr. Grove stated the following:
— TheJuan1️⃣ (@planethunter56) November 20, 2023
"The definitions of controlled versus catastrophic UFO disclosure are different at the national versus international levels…… pic.twitter.com/blK4DD4YxV